Proxmox Storage

Proxmox VE supports multiple storage types, each designed for specific use cases such as VM disks, backups, ISO images, and templates. Here’s a detailed comparison of all the storage types supported in Proxmox:
Author

Benedict Thekkel

1. Overview of Storage Types

Storage Type Description Common Use Case Pros Cons
Directory (dir) Local filesystem directory ISOs, backups, templates Easy setup, local access No redundancy, limited scalability
LVM (lvm) Logical Volume Manager VM disks High performance, snapshots No thin provisioning
LVM-Thin (lvmthin) Thin-provisioned LVM VM disks, snapshots Efficient space usage, snapshots Complex management
ZFS (zfspool) Advanced filesystem and volume manager VM disks, snapshots Snapshots, compression, RAID High RAM usage
Ceph (rbd) Distributed block storage High availability Scalability, redundancy Complex setup, network dependency
NFS (nfs) Network file system Shared storage, backups Centralized storage, scalable Network dependency
CIFS/SMB (cifs) Windows share Backups, ISOs Easy integration with NAS Slower network performance
iSCSI (iscsi) Network block storage VM disks High performance SAN Complex setup, network dependency
GlusterFS (glusterfs) Distributed file system High availability Scalability, redundancy Performance overhead

2. Directory Storage (dir)

Description:

  • Uses a local directory on the Proxmox host.
  • Can store ISOs, backups, LXC templates, and VM images.

Common Use Case:

  • Local storage for ISOs, backups, and VM templates.

Pros:

  • Easy to set up and manage.
  • Fast since it’s local storage.
  • Supports multiple content types (e.g., ISO, backup, images).

Cons:

  • No redundancy. If the local disk fails, data is lost.
  • Not scalable. Limited by local disk capacity.

Example Configuration:

dir: local
    path /var/lib/vz
    content iso,backup,vztmpl
    maxfiles 5

3. LVM (lvm)

Description:

  • Uses Logical Volume Manager for block storage.
  • No thin provisioning; each LV is fully allocated.

Common Use Case:

  • VM disks that require high performance and stability.

Pros:

  • High performance for VM disks.
  • Supports snapshots.
  • Easy to expand by adding physical volumes.

Cons:

  • No thin provisioning. Allocates the entire disk space upfront.
  • No native redundancy.

Example Configuration:

lvm: vmdata
    vgname vg_data
    content images

4. LVM-Thin (lvmthin)

Description:

  • Thin-provisioned LVM that allocates space on demand.
  • Efficient snapshots using Copy-on-Write (CoW).

Common Use Case:

  • VM disks with snapshots and dynamic space usage.

Pros:

  • Efficient space usage. Only allocates space as needed.
  • Fast snapshots with minimal overhead.

Cons:

  • Complex management. Requires monitoring to avoid over-provisioning.
  • No built-in redundancy.

Example Configuration:

lvmthin: thin_data
    vgname vg_data
    thinpool thinpool
    content images

5. ZFS (zfspool)

Description:

  • Advanced filesystem and volume manager.
  • Features snapshots, compression, checksums, and RAID-like redundancy.

Common Use Case:

  • High availability, data integrity, and VM storage with snapshots.

Pros:

  • Built-in redundancy with RAID-Z or mirrors.
  • Snapshots and rollback without performance impact.
  • Compression reduces storage space.

Cons:

  • High RAM usage. Minimum 8 GB RAM recommended.
  • Complex management compared to LVM.

Example Configuration:

zfspool: zdata
    pool zdata
    content images,rootdir
    sparse 1

6. Ceph (rbd)

Description:

  • Distributed block storage system.
  • Offers high availability, scalability, and redundancy.

Common Use Case:

  • Highly available VM disks across multiple Proxmox nodes.

Pros:

  • Scalable and redundant across nodes.
  • No single point of failure.
  • Dynamic growth by adding more nodes.

Cons:

  • Complex setup and maintenance.
  • Requires high network bandwidth and low latency.

Example Configuration:

rbd: ceph_pool
    pool rbd
    content images,rootdir
    krbd 1

7. NFS (nfs)

Description:

  • Network File System for shared storage.
  • Accessible by multiple Proxmox nodes.

Common Use Case:

  • Centralized storage for ISOs, backups, and templates.

Pros:

  • Easy to set up and manage.
  • Centralized storage for multiple nodes.
  • Scalable by expanding the NFS server.

Cons:

  • Network dependency. Performance affected by network speed.
  • No built-in redundancy.

Example Configuration:

nfs: nfs_data
    server 192.168.2.100
    export /mnt/nfs
    path /mnt/pve/nfs_data
    content images,iso,backup

8. CIFS/SMB (cifs)

Description:

  • Windows network share for storage.
  • Used for backups, ISOs, and templates.

Common Use Case:

  • Backing up to a NAS or Windows file server.

Pros:

  • Easy integration with Windows and NAS systems.
  • Good for backups and non-critical storage.

Cons:

  • Slower network performance compared to NFS.
  • Network dependency.

Example Configuration:

cifs: smb_data
    path /mnt/pve/smb_data
    server 192.168.2.100
    share backups
    content images,iso,backup

9. iSCSI (iscsi)

Description:

  • Network block storage protocol.
  • Uses external SAN for VM disks.

Common Use Case:

  • High-performance VM disks with external SAN.

Pros:

  • High performance and low latency.
  • Centralized storage with SAN features.

Cons:

  • Complex configuration and management.
  • Network dependency.

Example Configuration:

iscsi: iscsi_data
    portal 192.168.2.100
    target iqn.2024-02.com.example:target1
    content images

10. GlusterFS (glusterfs)

Description:

  • Distributed file system for scalability.
  • Ideal for high availability and redundancy.

Common Use Case:

  • Shared VM storage across multiple nodes.

Pros:

  • Scalable and redundant across nodes.
  • Easy to expand by adding nodes.

Cons:

  • Performance overhead.
  • Complex management and troubleshooting.

Example Configuration:

glusterfs: gluster_data
    server 192.168.2.200
    volume gv0
    path /mnt/pve/gluster_data
    content images,rootdir

Conclusion

Each storage type in Proxmox has its own strengths and use cases. Choose based on: - Performance needs (LVM, iSCSI) - Redundancy and scalability (Ceph, ZFS, GlusterFS) - Centralized storage (NFS, CIFS)

If you need help with choosing the right storage type, configuration, or troubleshooting, let me know! 🚀

Back to top